Legal Opinion

Menzel v. Lamproplos

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeal, 88PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Lawrence M. Menzel instituted this action in trespass for damage to his automobile resulting when a massive accumulation of ice fell from the second floor rainspouting of the premises of William Lamproplos, appellant. A jury returned a verdict for appellee in the sum of |200.00. After dismissal of appellant’s motion for judgment n.o.v., he has appealed complaining that there-was insufficient evidence (1) to charge him with negligence; and (2) to support a finding that the accumulation of icé existed for a sufficient length of time to charge appellant with notice of - the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Valentine v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Habel v. LongeneckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Vasser v. CarliniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API