State v. Madrigal
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Lucio P. Madrigal was found guilty of possession of cocaine. He appeals contending the State's evidence should have been suppressed because the police officer did not have an articulable reasonable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to justify an investigatory stop. We affirm.
Facts
Yakima Police Officer Rodney Light was on routine patrol at approximately 6 p.m. on November 19, 1989. A few hundred feet from the Yakima County Courthouse, he observed a "heated argument" between a man, later identified as Mr. Madrigal, and a woman, known to Officer Light as Tia Williamson. He heard the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GloverWashington Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RifeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PereaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. SilvaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.