Legal Opinion
United State Fire Insurance Co. v. Ammala
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 1983No. CX-82-916PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Brainerd Construction Services Company, Inc. (Brainerd), a general contractor for the State of Minnesota, brought an action in Aitkin County District Court against Er-land Ammala, a subcontractor, to recover the cost of repairing damage to its construction project caused by Ammala’s negligence. Because United States Fire Insurance Company (U.S. Fire) had paid Brain-erd for the cost of repair, it was substituted for Brainerd as the real party in interest. Ammala subsequently impleaded Wells Concrete Products Company as a third-party defendant, claiming that Wells was negligent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. GatzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Transamerica Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Gage Plumbing and Heating Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- E. C. Long, Inc. v. Brennan's of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Murray Plumbing & Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Depositors Ins. Co. v. DollanskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- St. Paul Companies v. Van BeekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Bigos v. KluenderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.