Holland v. Sutherland
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KIRSHBAUM, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Rex Holland and Ruth Holland, appeal a judgment entered against them and in favor of defendants on defendants’ counterclaim after trial to the court. We affirm.
Plaintiffs commenced this C.R.C.P. 105 proceeding in 1977, seeking to quiet title to specific real property located in Naturita, Colorado. Defendants J. P. and Oneida Sutherland counterclaimed, alleging superi- or title and ownership by adverse possession.
The record reveals that plaintiffs’ grant- or, John Brinkley, and defendants each received title to the property in dispute (Lot 4) from Elmer and Marty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Thiele v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Concord Corporation v. HuffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Niles v. ChurchillColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kroulik v. KnuppelColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Kim v. JP MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020