Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kapp v. Sullivan Chevrolet Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1962No. 5-2384Published

1DissentEd. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice

It was established beyond doubt that the seat belt broke in the automobile collision and that Mrs. Kapp was injured. The plaintiffs claimed that the seat belt was defective ; and this was denied by the defendants. So one of the main issues was whether the belt was defective. At the conclusion of all the evidence the Trial Court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendants, Bob Sullivan Chevrolet Company and General Motors Corporation; and, thereby, the Court declared that the plaintiffs had not presented any substantial evidence to sustain their allegation that the belt was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oviatt, Administrator v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. McAllister, Administrator v. CalhounSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Garner v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Smith, Admx. v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. Thompson, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Barnes v. Hope Basket CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API