Legal Opinion

Van Vleet-Ellis Corp. v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMehaefy, J.

Appellant began this suit in the Clay Circuit Court against J. N. Higginbotham, alleging that it was a corporation engaged in the wholesale drug business, and that it is the successor of Hessig-Ellis Drug Company, by reason of a merger and consolidation of Van Vleet-Mansfield Drug Company with Hessig-Ellis Drug Company; that the appellee, J. N. Higginbotham, and his son, Jewell N. Higginbotham, on March 16, 1927, up to and including April 6,19'28, were operating Higginbotham Drug .Store at Bernie, Missouri. It was alleged that Higginbotham and his son were partners, and operating the business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crosby v. LucasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Bailey v. Florsheim Bros. Dry Goods CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Meyers Stores, Inc. v. Wurzburg BrothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. East Arkansas Lumber Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API