Legal Opinion

McCown v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 10, 2009No. AC 28691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Larry McCown, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly failed to conclude that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel, under the totality of the circumstances, by (1) failing to ensure that the petitioner’s witness at a suppression hearing obeyed a sequestration order, (2) entering into a stipulation without his knowledge concerning General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 29-38, (3) failing to object to an erroneous instruction by the trial…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. State v. MebaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  4. State v. McCownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Vasquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Young v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. McCown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API