Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Meier & Frank Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELT, J. —

Relative to the question of damages, plaintiff offered evidence tending to show that, as a direct and natural result of the alleged false imprisonment, she suffered extreme physical and mental pain. According to her contention, she had a nervous breakdown and was confined to her bed for several weeks under the care of a physician and nurse. In response to a hypothetical question, expert medical witnesses testified that, in their opinion, the condition could reasonably be attributed to her treatment by defendant. To refute such claim and to show that her nervous condition was not the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Konig v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Adair v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Springer v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Strain v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. GalvinOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Brown v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McNeff v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McNeff v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API