Legal Opinion

Bertles v. Hawkins Motor Car Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1917No. 13576PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 3, 1916, in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury of no damages to either party, in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, J. —

On October 24, 1913, two automobiles collided upon the streets of Spokane. One of the automobiles belonged to the respondent. The other was driven by an agent of the appellant. Both automobiles were damaged. The. appellant now claims that its automobile was damaged to the extent of $293. The respondent brought an action in the justice court to recover from the appellant for damages which were alleged in the complaint to be $99.99^ to respondent’s automobile. The appellant appeared in the justice court, filed an answer, and counterclaimed for damages to its machine in the sum of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. ShoemakeWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamond Ice & Storage Co. v. Klock Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Centennial Flouring Mills Co. v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Huether v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API