Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Blackburn v. Workers' Compensation Division

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2002No. 29543Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAlbright, Justice

(Filed Dee. 11, 2002)

I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority opinion formulating temporary rules for determinations of awards in Workers’ Compensation hearing loss cases. While I do not necessarily disagree with the substance of the rules formulated by the majority, I believe that this Court has exceeded its authority by engaging in what is essentially a rule-making function, regardless of the fact that such rules are intended as only interim rules. A complex system exists within this State for the consideration and promulgation of rules within the Workers’ Compensation realm.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mayhorn v. Logan Medical FoundationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Chico Dairy Co. v. West Virginia Human Rights CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gilman v. ChoiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hasson v. City of ChesterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Johnson v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API