Legal Opinion

Rebekah Assembly v. Pulse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1910No. 7,037Published

Prom Bartholomew Circuit Court; Marshall Hacker, Judge. Action by William C. Pulse and others against the Rebekah Assembly, Independent Order of Odd Fellows of the State of Indiana. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing.

Adams, J.

— Appellees have filed a petition for a rehearing in this cause, supported by an able brief of their counsel. It is earnestly contended that the opinion of the court is erroneous, in that it does not correctly state the rule, as declared in the cases of Cleveland, etc., R. Co. v. Moore (1908), 170 Ind. 528, and Norton v. Browne (1883), 89 Ind. 333. "We have carefully examined these cases, and adhere to the construction set out in the original opinion.

It is also insisted that the opinion is based upon the unwarranted assumption that the building of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. City of Auburn v. State ex rel. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Norton v. BrowneIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API