Legal Opinion

Faquan Hill v. Lieutenant Baity, et al.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01393Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FAQUAN HILL, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:24-CV-1393 v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) LIEUTENANT BAITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Faquan Hill has filed a motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 37) and a “Motion for Reconsideration/Motion to Clarify” the Court’s memorandum and order dismissing his First Amendment access-to-courts claim (Doc. 38). For the following reasons, the request for reconsideration will be denied, but the docket will be amended to reflect the identification of a Jane Doe defendant and an additional exhibit to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Qazizadeh v. Pinnacle Health SystemDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Wysong Corp. v. M.I. IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Clark Distribution Systems, Inc. v. ALG Direct, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Gardner v. Luzerne CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API