Legal Opinion

Wilson v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 10, 2008No. 356, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

Adam R. Wilson (“Wilson”), the defendant below, appeals from a final judgment of conviction entered by the Superior Court. A jury found Wilson guilty of robbery in the first degree, wearing a disguise during the commission of a felony, and conspiracy in the second degree. On appeal, Wilson claims that the Superior Court erred by: (1) not allowing the co-conspirator’s plea agreement to be admitted into evidence unredacted; (2) not declaring a mistrial based on the prosecutor’s allegedly prejudicial statement to the jury; and (3) admitting evidence of other bad acts and drug…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  4. Appiah v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. Hazelett v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API