Legal Opinion

Frederick H. Bruemmer v. The Clark Equipment Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 26, 1965No. 14616_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Frederick H. Bruemmer, a citizen of Indiana, brought this diversity action against defendant The Clark Equipment Company (defendant), a Michigan corporation, and Brown & Kerr, Incorporated (Brown), an Illinois corporation, for damages sustained when plaintiff fell through a hole in the roof of a building owned by defendant.

The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and plaintiff appealed. Subsequently, plaintiff and Brown proceeded to trial where judgment was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Marion Shoe Co. v. EppleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Leet v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Gary v. Bontrager Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Stewart v. HuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Lukowski v. Vecta Educational Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Wyler v. Lilly Varnish Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Hale v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  5. Wyler v. Lilly Varnish Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API