Washington v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
*539 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION
2Per curiam
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion for clarification to clarify the sentence which may be imposed on him upon remand. We therefore withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following opinion.
Appellant, Larry Washington, asserts that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a habitual felony offender where the trial court accepted his open plea of guilty without first confirming that he was personally aware of the ramifications of habitualization. Because the trial court did not confirm that appellant was aware…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Morganti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Shacraha v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Regueiro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995