Alberta E. Burns, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MacKINNON.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner, Alberta Burns, is a retiree who ranks within a special and dwindling category of social insurance recipients. She is a dual beneficiary. She receives primary benefits, on her own account, as a retired worker covered under the Social Security Act (SSA). She also receives derivative benefits as the surviving spouse of a worker covered under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA).1 The SSA requires the reduction of a recipient’s benefits by one dollar for every…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Linquist v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Linquist v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- Linquist v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Denver S. Cooper v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Nicholas v. RileyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.