Legal Opinion

Snow v. Marcelle

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 9, 1950No. Civ. No. 8821PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue for a refund in the amount of $14,372.51, which sum was assessed against them as additional taxes for the tax year 1941, as a result of the Commissioner’s disallowance of a capital loss claimed to arise from the worthlessness of stock of City Mortgage Company (City). The loss was disallowed on the ground that the stock had become worthless prior to 1941. The relevant tax statute is Internal Revenue Code, Sec. 23(g) (2), 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(g) (2). Plaintiffs’ rights are also ruled by Regulations 103, article 23(e)-4 issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Morton v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
  3. Morton v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. Bullard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George Palen Snow and Carmel Snow v. Joseph P. Marcelle, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API