Legal Opinion

People v. Autar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gorges, J.), rendered July 1, 1998, convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*653The defendant’s contentions that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. DelgadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. ButtsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API