Legal Opinion

Davis & Partners, LLC v. QBE Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The parties agree that under New Jersey law defendant’s failure to show that it was prejudiced as a result of the untimely notice of occurrence it received pursuant to the subject insurance policy would render its disclaimer of coverage on that ground invalid. However, New York law, although it now requires a showing of prejudice, did not require such a showing at the time the policy was issued (see Argo Corp. v Greater N.Y. *545Mut. Ins. Co., 4 NY3d 332 [2005]; Insurance Law § 3420, as amended by L 2008, ch 388, §§ 2-6, eff Jan. 17, 2009). Having been provided to defendant 18 months after the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Argo Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re the Liquidation of Midland InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Tower Insurance v. Classon Heights, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lighton Indus., Inc. v. Allied World Nat'l Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API