Legal Opinion

Damato v. Gilman

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 4, 1949No. File 78583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

In this action, transferred from the Court of Common Pleas, the plaintiff, tenant under a written lease, seeks relief from a forfeiture for nonpayment of rent, an injunction restraining the defendant landlords from proceeding with sum' mary process to dispossess him, or other equitable relief. The plaintiff is presently in possession of the premises pursuant to a temporary injunction issued on application to a judge of the City Court of Norwalk to forestall threatened summary pro' cess.

The parties entered into a written lease for a period of five years from November 1, 1944, with a provision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burritt v. LunnySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Marshall v. PartykaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Dialtone Corp. v. Stephen Pont. Cadillac, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1976
  3. Dialtone Corp. v. Stephen Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API