Legal Opinion
Brostowin v. Hanover Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover under a fire insurance policy, the defendant Hanover Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Christ, J.), dated December 9, 1988, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and the cross claim against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint insofar as it is asserted against Hanover Insurance Company and cross claim against it are dismissed, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
*419On April 4,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- E.F.S. Ventures Corp. v. FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Igbara Realty Corp. v. New York Property InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Anthony Marino Construction Corp. v. INA Underwriters InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Aryeh v. Westchester Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bailey v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Vena v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Goldman v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ball v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Holmes v. Skil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.