Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1959No. 3695Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Appellant’s suit against appellees alleged default by the latter in payment of the purchase price under an executory contract to convey realty, designated as lot 3A, asserting rescission. Alternatively, judgment was sought for the balance due on a note for $1,350 and foreclosure of liens on lot 6A and lot 3A, securing payment of the note. This is a jury case.

At the conclusion of the evidence, the court sustained appellees’ motion to require appellant to elect between the inconsistent remedies of rescission as to the contract of sale, and the action for debt and foreclosure.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Manning v. ChristianTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Walls v. CruseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Trinity-Universal Ins. Co. v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Young v. FittsTexas Supreme Court · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API