Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1994No. Nos. 92-3019, 92-3258 and 93-0397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We hereby sua sponte consolidate Case Numbers 92-3019, 92-3258 and 93-0397.

In view of the overall findings and holdings of the trial court, and especially the distribution of marital property and the award of lump sum alimony to the wife, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in the denial of permanent alimony or the distribution of marital assets. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980). Similarly, we find no error by the trial court in the continuation of the husband’s obligations for certain expenses after the final hearing and the denial of credit to the husband…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Widom v. WidomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Mason v. BisognoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API