Marcello v. Maine
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
The state of Maine, the Third District Court of Newport, and William Anderson, a judge of the Maine District Court, move to dismiss James and Olivia Marcello’s law suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 The Court concludes that Judge Anderson is absolutely immune under the doctrine of judi cial immunity; that the Third District Court of Newport is absolutely immune under the doctrine of judicial immunity, is not a “person” under § 1983, and is immune under the doctrine of sovereign immunity; that the state of Maine is not a “person” under…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeCotiis v. WhittemoreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Cline v. LockeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- VILLENEUVE v. MILLSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
- WILLINGHAN v. Town of StoningtonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010