Legal Opinion

Marcello v. Maine

District Court, D. Maine

Decided December 13, 2006No. CV-06-68 BWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

The state of Maine, the Third District Court of Newport, and William Anderson, a judge of the Maine District Court, move to dismiss James and Olivia Marcello’s law suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 The Court concludes that Judge Anderson is absolutely immune under the doctrine of judi cial immunity; that the Third District Court of Newport is absolutely immune under the doctrine of judicial immunity, is not a “person” under § 1983, and is immune under the doctrine of sovereign immunity; that the state of Maine is not a “person” under…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeCotiis v. WhittemoreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
  2. Cline v. LockeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
  3. VILLENEUVE v. MILLSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
  4. WILLINGHAN v. Town of StoningtonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API