Legal Opinion

In Re Cueto

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 23, 1978No. M-11-188PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

The Issue Raised

Movants, Maria Cueto and Raisa Nemikin, were cited for civil contempt under 28 U.S.C. § 1826(a) for refusing to answer certain questions before a grand jury investigating the terrorist bombing activities of an organization called Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional Puertorriqueña (“FALN”). Pursuant to their contempt adjudications, they were ordered confined during the life of the grand jury or until they agreed to testify, and both have been held in confinement at the Metropolitan Correctional Center — Nemikin since March 1, and Cueto…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McNeil v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pacific Coast European Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Alejandrina TorresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Morris Simkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of Joseph Braun, WitnessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Julio Rosado, Andres Rosado, Ricardo Romero, Steven Guerra, and Maria CuetoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Dowell (In Re Dowell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API