Legal Opinion

People v. Bourg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 26, 1976No. 26387PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Defendant was convicted by a jury of selling a narcotic drug “with intent to induce and aid another to unlawfully use and possess” the drug in violation of C.R.S. 1963, 48-5-20(1)(a) and (c) (“hard sale” statute). On appeal, defendant’s principal claim is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction on this charge. We agree. The evidence, however, is sufficient to sustain his conviction on the lesser included offense of unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, C.R.S. 1963, 48-5-2 2 (“soft sale” statute). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

The prosecution’s evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SummitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. People v. CookeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. People v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. People v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. People v. SteedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BloomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. State v. VailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. People v. HodgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. People v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. PrattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API