Youmans v. Heartt
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw Circuit. on the subject of interest, cited: 1 Am. L. G. (519), 632, et seq.; Van Beuren v. Van Gaasbeck, 4 Cow., 496; Reid v. Renns. Glass factory, 3 Cow., 393; S. C., 5 Cow., 587; Smith v. Velie, 60 N. Y., 106; Wood v. Belden, 59 Barb., 549; Beardslee v. Horton, 3 Mich., 560; Davis v. Horton, 18 Mich., 25; and on the subject of application of payments: 1 Am.
Read the full summary
Error to Saginaw Circuit. on the subject of interest, cited: 1 Am. L. G. (519), 632, et seq.; Van Beuren v. Van Gaasbeck, 4 Cow., 496; Reid v. Renns. Glass factory, 3 Cow., 393; S. C., 5 Cow., 587; Smith v. Velie, 60 N. Y., 106; Wood v. Belden, 59 Barb., 549; Beardslee v. Horton, 3 Mich., 560; Davis v. Horton, 18 Mich., 25; and on the subject of application of payments: 1 Am. L. C. (277-8, 280), 342, notes 1, 2, 3, 344, note 7, et seq.; Mayor v. Patten, 4 Cranch, 317; Otto v. Klauber, 23 Wis., 474. cited on the subject of interest: Reid v. Renns., etc., 3 Cozo., 393, 426; Esterly v. Cole, 3…
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, J:
Heartt brought an action of assumpsit against Youmans as surviving partner of Bundy & Youmans. Bundy in his lifetime was a member of three firms: Bundy & Martindale, carrying on a shingle mill; J. F. Bandy & Co., carrying on the lumber business, except sawing; and Bundy & You-mans, owning and operating a saw mill and salt works. Heartt had business with Bundy & Martindale, and also with Bundy & Youmans, but had no business with J. F. Bundy & Co. The business of Heartt with the two firms was in 1872. Bundy & Martindale kept a separate set of books; but all the business of the other…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Grossman v. LangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Van Sceiver v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Thompson v. PopeNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Grant v. FletcherDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Nichols, Shepherd & Co. v. KnowlesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1881