Legal Opinion

Rodley v. Curry

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1898No. Sac. No. 341PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Butte County denying a new trial. John C. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.-

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

The complaint in this action alleged that there was due from defendants to plaintiff for medical services $390.33, and prayed judgment in that sum. The answer denied the services, and denied the value of the services to have been “$390.33, or any other sum.” The pleadings were verified. When the cause was called for trial both parties announced themselves ready. The court then stated the title of the case to the reporter. *542’Whereupon plaintiff’s attorney made the following statement to the court: “I understand it to be a general rule of this court to dispense with the services of a…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Becker v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sellery v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API