Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Hoch

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Marion District Court. Action brought by Hoch against the Board of Commissioners of Marion Co., for a bounty of $58.75, to which he claimed to be entitled under the provisions of “An act to encourage the growing of hedges and the building of stone fences.” Trial at the April Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for the plaintiff. The Board brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by W. F. Hoch against the board of commissioners of Marion county, for a bounty claimed to have accrued to him under the provisions of the “ act to encourage the growing of hedges,” etc. (Comp. Laws of 1879, pp. 453, 454.) The plaintiff grew an Osage-orange hedge in accordance with the provisions of said act. Judgment was rendered in the court below, upon an agreed statement of the facts of the case, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the amount of the bounty claimed, and the defendant now…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Board of Commissioners v. WinkleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API