Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Toenjes

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1930No. 40008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

The plaintiff-appellant is a lessee of certain real estate in Waterloo, and has an option to purchase the same. Desiring to erect thereon “an automobile filling station,” the appellant made application to the defendant-appellee D. B. Toenjes, then the Waterloo buildinspector, for a license granting the former the right of storing inflammable liquids underground, in connection with the conduct of such business. Whereupon, the building inspector denied the application, because the city, through its council, would not approve it.

At the time in controversy, there was in full force and effect in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. City of Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Bear v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Storer v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Rehmann v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Huff v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Wilson v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Bernstein v. City of MarshalltownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. City of Bloomfield v. Davis County Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API