Legal Opinion

Pinter v. Hantzsche

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1937No. 2905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The owner of certain real estate brought an action in forcible entry and detainer in the Municipal Court to obtain possession of said real estate from his tenant. There was a written lease between said landlord and tenant which provided that if said tenant should "use said premises in any unlawful way or for any unlawful purpose, * * * said lessor may recover possession of said premises, and terminate this lease, without' reference to the time said lease would otherwise have expired.”

The claim of the landlord was that said tenant, without his consent, used said premises in an unlawful…

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. HairstonCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2003
  2. Bredwell v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API