Legal Opinion

State v. Sweeney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 2005No. 22599-2-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 —An adult or juvenile who possesses a firearm after being convicted of any serious criminal offense is guilty of first degree unlawful possession of a firearm. RCW 9.41.040(l)(a). James William Sweeney pleaded guilty to second degree burglary, a serious offense, when he was a minor. Twelve years later, he was arrested and charged for unlawfully possessing a rifle. The trial court found that the juvenile burglary had washed out and therefore could not serve as the predicate offense for unlawful possession of a firearm. The State appeals the dismissal of the charge against Mr. Sweeney,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MinorWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. BreitungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. BreitungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Siperek v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API