Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank H. Molitor, Frank H. Molitor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1964No. 18747PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

We have before us in this case two-appeals, one by the United States, and" the other by Frank H. Molitor, hereinafter “Molitor”, and involving Social Security and Income taxes withheld from wages received by the employees of Anchorage Bus Company, Inc., a corporation.

There is no dispute that for the last, quarter of 1955 and the first quax*ter of 1956, the Anchorage Bus Company owed to the United States withholding and federal insurance contributions act. (FICA) taxes in the amount of $11,-143.58, which amount the corporation never paid. On December 23, 1957, the-above…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. Joseph X. StreblerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  4. Molton G. Smith v. Walter T. Stone, Chief Division of Adult Paroles of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Fern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. Felix Benitez RexachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Joseph G. LeaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. Alfred M. Sinder, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant, and Angelo Ventrone, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Medeiros v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. United States v. StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API