Dronet v. E-Z Mart

hWOODARD, J.,

dissenting.

I must respectfully disagree with the majority’s opinion because there is nothing in the record or in the briefs, submitted on appeal, which suggests that these parties sought a determination regarding Ms. Dronet’s right to receive SEB benefits; thus, prescription, as it relates to SEBs, is not before us. As such, any holding on this issue is inappropriate and unnecessary.

On the other hand, the parties, clearly, did expect us to reconcile the issue of whether Ms. Dronet’s claim for TTDs had prescribed. The majority opinion disposed of her claim for TTDs by concluding…