Legal Opinion

Bartel v. A-C Product Liability Trust

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 2015No. CONSOLIDATED UNDER MDL 875; E.D. PA CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-32119-ERPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*745MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRE NO, District Judge.

This case was. transferred in February 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Qhio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E. Bartel and Dayid E. Peebles (“Plaintiffs”), .Administrators of the Estate of, James M. Schulte, allege.that Mr. Schulte (“Decedent” or “Mr. Schulte”) was exposed to asbestos while…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API