State v. Glen Haskins, Jr.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Robinson, J.,
¶ 43. dissenting. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court erred in excluding the officer’s testimony regarding what Chad Limoge said to him when Limoge called to report that defendant had committed the crime. But I do not agree that the error was harmless. The State’s evidence was far more equivocal than acknowledged by the majority, and the jury could have assigned more probative value to the excluded evidence than the majority has. Properly applying harmless-error review to the evidence in this case, I cannot join the majority’s conclusion that the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. LipkaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. HazeltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.