Legal Opinion
Long v. MacDougall
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 26, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries and property damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff in a collision between two automobiles, one driven by the plaintiff and the other by the defendant. The answer of the defendant is a general denial, and a special answer to the effect that a judgment had been entered in behalf of Barbara J. MacDougall against Oscar Long in the Superior Court as the result of an action founded upon the same collision.
Subject to the exception of the plaintiff, the judge permitted the defendant to file an amendment setting up…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Savage v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Biggio v. MageeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Brooks v. TwitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Joyce v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cambria v. JefferyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Elfman v. GlaserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Ansara v. ReganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Macheras v. SyrmopoulosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Miller v. NortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.