Legal Opinion
Curtis 1000, Inc. v. Suess
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided February 1, 1994No. 93-4093PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MIHM, Chief Judge.
On November 2, 1993, Plaintiff Curtis 1000, Inc. filed an Amended Complaint bringing an action against Defendant Roy H. Suess for breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation, and tortious interference with prospective business advantage and against Defendant American Business Forms, Inc. [ABF] for trade secret misappropriation, tortious interference with prospective business advantage and tortious interference with contract. Curtis brought this action in federal court based on the diversity jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
On November 4, 1993,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Norton Sarnoff and Carl Fletcher, and v. American Home Products Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Composite Marine Propellers, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Gerbrig Van Der Woude, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Omega Satellite Products Company v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curtis 1000, Incorporated v. Roy H. Suess and American Business Forms, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. Williams Staffing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- St. Paul Furniture Mfg. Co. v. BergmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- American Guardian Warranty Services, Inc. v. Automobile Protection Corporation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Carriage Hill v. Hayden, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.