Legal Opinion

Charlot v. Goldwire

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2011No. A11A0684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

This case arose after Larousse Chariot, the biological father of B. C., pro se, filed a petition for legitimation and custody or visitation against Meesha Goldwire, the child’s mother. Goldwire answered and counterclaimed for custody, support, and attorney fees. Chariot filed a motion for genetic testing, which Goldwire did not contest, instead agreeing to the DNA testing “to determine [B. C.’s] paternity in lieu of holding a hearing [on paternity].” Both parties appeared at a hearing on the motion, after which, the trial court granted the motion and ordered them to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blue v. BlueSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Fine v. FineSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Spurlock v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Padilla v. PadillaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Roberts v. TharpSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Murray v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Jackson v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API