Legal Opinion

The Strathearn

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided January 2, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by Hugo Ronlund, John Hoikkla, and John Dillon against the British steamship Strathearn.

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPPARD, District Judge.

This case concerns two seamen and a carpenter of the British steamship Strathearn, who assumed that *584they were entitled to invoke the provisions of the new so-called Seamen’s Act of 1915, under which they made demand on the master of the Strathearn for wages under section 4 of the act. Upon the master’s refusal to comply with their demands, they quit the service of the ship and libeled.

The Strathearn arrived in the Port of Pensacola between 5 and 6 o’clock July 31, 1916, and shortly thereafter the libelants left her under the following circumstances:

Hugo Ronlund went…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The DelagoaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1917
  2. The StrathearnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  3. Low Ling Sing v. Standard Transp. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. The SutherlandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1919
  5. The TalusDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API