Legal Opinion

Washington v. City of Winchester

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 14, 1997No. 95-CA-1775-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*589 OPINION

SCHRODER, Judge:

The initial facts of this case are well known to the parties and to the Court as a result of the first appeal in this same matter. Washington v. City of Winchester, Ky.App., 861 S.W.2d 125 (1993). On remand, the appellant was given a reasonable time to repair or demolish the structure. Appellant ultimately declined to make necessary repairs and the structure was demolished. Appellant was permitted to amend her complaint to allege damages for violation of her Kentucky Constitutional rights. The gist of the claim appears to be for deprivation of the use of the property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Board of Trustees of U. of Ky. v. HayseKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bolden v. City of CovingtonKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Washington v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jaime Morales v. City of Georgetown, KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API