Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1967No. 42611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

As defined by the Code, specific intent is an essential element of a “Peeping Tom” misdemeanor, in that it must appear that the accused was on or about the premises of another for the purpose, i.e., intention, of spying upon or invading the privacy of another, or of doing acts which tend .to invade the privacy of another. Code §§ 26-2001, 26-2002. The State offered testimony about the 1964 offense for the sole purpose of showing the intent with which the accused acted, or, as later stated, “to show the intent with which the accused acted on the night of this occurrence, the past…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bacon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. McMichen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Bacon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Pilcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TreadawayArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sloan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Wimberly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Sloan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API