Williams v. H. E. Stoudt & Son, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Eagen,
This is an action for personal injuries tried before a judge without a jury by agreement. Specific findings of fact and conclusions of law were found by the trial judge and a decision rendered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff’s exceptions to the findings and conclusions were dismissed by the court en banc and a final judgment for the defendants entered. These appeals followed.
The trial court found, inter alia, that “the plaintiff’s own careless and negligent conduct contributed to the production of his injuries,” which fact barred recovery. It is established…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Claughton v. Bear Stearns & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Dorn v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Erie Coach Co. v. Erie Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kopar v. MAMONESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Dauphin Deposit Trust Co. v. World Mutual Health & Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ambler Borough v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Mead Nursing Home v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.