Legal Opinion

Feisthamel v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, without costs. Even if the arbitrator refused to hear evidence of petitioners’ character or their service record, such refusal was not misconduct, for the *698reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (84 AD2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Suffolk County Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994