Legal Opinion

Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2009No. 07-2274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Chief Judge.

In litigation arising from the Secretary of Health and Human Services’s (“HHS”) decision not to enter into a self-determination contract with the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, the district court issued two operative orders: the first order determined that the HHS decision was unlawful, granted summary judgment to the Tribe, and ordered the Tribe to prepare a form of an order for injunctive relief for HHS approval. The parties could not reach an agreement, which resulted in continued litigation and culminated in the district court’s second order, which found in favor of the HHS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Lynn E. Boughton v. Cotter Corporation Commonwealth Edison Company, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tronox Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  2. In re Rockford Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Hatten-Gonzales v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Gordon v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Gordon)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API