Legal Opinion · Dissent

Broadwater v. Dorsey

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 6, 1995No. 63Published

1DissentCathell, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I initially note that I take little issue with the majority’s discussion of the facts and with the inferences it draws therefrom in respect to the character of the Broadwaters or their son. Nor do I have any dispute with the majority over that portion of its opinion that addresses the Broadwaters’ knowledge or that portion that addresses causation. I do take issue with the majority’s view of the scope of the tort of negligent entrustment.

This is, I believe, a case of first impression in Maryland. The courts of this State, in my view, have not, until now, recognized…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McCart v. MuirSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Rounds, Admr. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  3. Kahlenberg v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Golembe v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. Shipp v. DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API