Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Blankenship

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 14, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion to Dissolve Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

*727Opinion by

Judge Hurt

— Dissolving injunction.

The plaintiffs, H. G. Daniel and Guy E. Robertson, S. E. Bennett, Ozna Schults, D. Melvin Stewart, J. S. Glenn, T. B. Tichenor, Newton R. Baize, J. R. Miller, Joseph Smith, R. C. Tichenor, R. T. Hagerman, B. W. Taylor, and Isaac Keown, filed their declarations as candidates for the nomination of the Democratic party, at the regular primary election, held in the year 1917, for the various county offices, and district offices of the county of Ohio, to be voted for as candidates for the respective offces, for which they sought the nominations, at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heitzman v. VoiersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Brodie v. HaswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Dobbs v. CreceliusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whitney v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Lewis v. MoselyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Campbell v. Mason, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Hewlett v. CartersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Justice v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API