Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 11, 1908No. 15,662PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original proceeding in quo warranto.

1Per curiam

This is an original action in quo warranto, brought by A. J. Hudson, who was a candidate for councilman of the city of Chanute, against C. E. Conklin, another candidate for the same office, who received a majority of the votes cast and is in possession of the office. The ground of contest is that Conklin was ineligible . to accept or hold the office because he was not an owner of real estate within the city, but the ineligibility of' Conklin, if it exists, does not give a minority candidate any claim to the office. (Wood v. Bartling, Mayor, 16 Kan. 109; Privett v. Bickford, 26 Kan. 52, 40 Am.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Privett v. BickfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Wood v. BartlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pooser v. WesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Scamahorn v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Moore v. WesleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Christian v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Coates v. CampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API