Hudson v. Conklin
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in quo warranto.
1Per curiam
This is an original action in quo warranto, brought by A. J. Hudson, who was a candidate for councilman of the city of Chanute, against C. E. Conklin, another candidate for the same office, who received a majority of the votes cast and is in possession of the office. The ground of contest is that Conklin was ineligible . to accept or hold the office because he was not an owner of real estate within the city, but the ineligibility of' Conklin, if it exists, does not give a minority candidate any claim to the office. (Wood v. Bartling, Mayor, 16 Kan. 109; Privett v. Bickford, 26 Kan. 52, 40 Am.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Privett v. BickfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Wood v. BartlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pooser v. WesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Scamahorn v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Moore v. WesleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Christian v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Coates v. CampSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.