Legal Opinion

Kay v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1995No. 66065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Appellant, Tony Joe Kay, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We remand for the limited purpose of determining whether appellant’s failure to timely file an amended Rule 24.035 motion was due to the fault of counsel, or of appellant.

On March 27, 1992, the state charged appellant with first degree robbery, in violation of RSMo § 569.020 (1986), and armed criminal action, in violation of RSMo § 571.015 (1986). The state agreed to drop the armed criminal action count in return for appellant’s guilty plea.

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API