Legal Opinion

Sadlier v. Riggs

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 7, 1890Published

Motion by respondent for reargument or leave to appeal to the court of appeals. For former report, see 8 N. Y. Supp. 473.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Respondent fails to show that some question decisive of the-case has been overlooked, or that the decision is inconsistent with some statute or with a controlling decision, and no sufficient ground for reargument is, therefore, shown. See rule 16, general term of the court of common pleas. The point relied upon by respondent was fully discussed upon the argument-of the appeal, and was determined adversely to him. See opinion herein, general term, February, 1890. 8 N. Y. Supp. 473. Respondent is further precluded from urging his exception to so much of the charge of the trial justice-as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spofford v. RowanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887
  2. Sadlier v. RiggsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API